Statistical analysis
Of fourteen inquiries from cervical cancers testing, female whose score was in fact ? ten were arbitrarily classified as the having ‘a knowledge’ if not was considered as having “negative studies”. To possess experience with HPV, women whose respond to was ‘never ever been aware of HPV’ were omitted in the analysis of HPV studies.
Out of 5 issues, female whose get was in fact ? step 3 had been considered as with ‘an effective knowledge of HPV’ normally while the ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Away from 19 questions, feminine whose rating have been ? thirteen was categorized as which have ‘an excellent total knowledge’ if not due to the fact ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.
All data was accumulated within the an electronic digital database and you may assessed having fun with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to research group data and you may was basically described given that numbers which have commission, suggest with fundamental departure otherwise median which have assortment. The newest association between each changeable and you can training rating was assessed playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was made when you look at the multivariable data as well as all of the details probably associated with the information and knowledge get. The latest felt amount of analytical benefit was an excellent p-value of 0.05 or less.
Overall performance
From 500 women who satisfied addition standards and you can were invited towards the investigation, you to ong 499 women who taken care of immediately new questionnaire from the degree from cervical malignant tumors and you may examination (region II) and you can information about HPV (part II), a few did not offer personal information. Thus group study was in fact available in merely 497 women (Desk step one). The newest indicate age of 497 members was years (SD ± ). Over fifty percent of users were old Table step one. Socio-monetary feature (Letter = 497).
The new symptoms to have colposcopy was basically irregular cervical cytology which have exposure off HR-HPV (155; 30.2%), irregular cytology which have negative or not familiar from Hours-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), visibility out-of simply Hours-HPV (65; 13.1%), or only reputation of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Desk dos).
Based on each matter regarding the cervical cancer evaluation (Dining table step 3), 95.4% from 499 women misinterpreted that women should be screened having cervical disease (Q 1). Around 55% to help you 70% knew when you should initiate and you can regularity regarding evaluating (Q dos–4). However, only 17.4% and you can 36.3%was in fact aware this new evaluating wasn’t called for next–once hysterectomy to possess low-cervical cancer (Q 5) otherwise immediately following 65 ages that have reputation of consecutively typical early in the day review (Q 6).
On methods of examination (Q eight–14), 79% regarding players was aware that there had been of several tests strategies (Q seven). Yet not, just 7.2% got knowledge that cervical evaluating might be done at that time out-of pelvic test (Q 8). The players was in fact regularly cervical cytologic analysis (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV review (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-evaluation (Q 12; ninety-five.4%) however which have artwork examination shortly after acetic acid (VIA) that was identified in just 29.7% (Q 9). In addition, 57.7% and you can 65.3% out-of people got myth that cervical cancers assessment could well be over because of the imaging (Q thirteen) and you will blood sample for tumor indicators (Q 14), respectively.
Having expertise in HPV, 110 people (20.0%) got never ever heard of HPV. One of the kept 389 people, vast majority (92.5%) realized you to definitely HPV illness are avoidable and you may 85.1% had been conscious it’s preventable by vaccination. Regardless of if majority (90.5%) know one to cervical cancers stems from oncogenic HPV, merely about 50 % knew it may be avoided by avoiding sexual interest or venereal wart is due to non-oncogenic HPV.
We examined experience with the players because of the score (Table cuatro). The latest imply scores of players getting panamansk-pigen er den hotteste experience with cervical cancers testing (Letter = 499) as well as HPV (Letter = 389) was basically ± dos.37 (of fourteen questions) and you will 3.53 ± step 1.11 (from 5 concerns), respectively. Because of the categorization, twenty six.9% and you may 20.1% had good experience with cervical cancer assessment and HPV correspondingly. Brand new indicate share get of knowledge on cervical cancer tumors screening and you can HPV was indeed ± dos.87 (of 19 concerns), with only 25.2% got a great complete training.